Revert UI queueing (#6789, #6829, #6840) - #6900
Merged
Princess-Cheeseballs merged 3 commits intoAug 4, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…ientBui (space-wizards#6840)" This reverts commit 08b3257.
…es in order. (space-wizards#6829)" This reverts commit c766e79.
…wizards#6789)" This reverts commit f44d7e0.
13 tasks
Princess-Cheeseballs
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2026
Princess-Cheeseballs
left a comment
Princess-Cheeseballs
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Queued Updates are pretty peak but yeah they often break if you're not careful. Worth pursuing in the future:tm:
Contributor
Author
|
Sorry for the saga, I'll try to make sure the next one's right. |
Member
No need to apologize, this is a normal part of the learning process. Now you know how to do better. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #6789, #6829, #6840.
It's a good concept, a nice feature, but it breaks on edge cases and needs a test suite for correctness.
Not giving up on it, and I think it's good conceptually, but man.